Welcome to Foundry Management & Technology Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

REB Blog

Life and times in the world of metalcasting, and in the rest of the world, too.

The "core" of the problem

I've written elsewhere about the oddity of Ford Motor Co.'s retreat from metalcasting, just as GM, Chrysler, Honda, and Toyota are expanding similar operations. There's a lot more to be said — and discovered — about this decision. And, I'd love to hear readers' thoughts about what it means. But, …

I can't get out of my head the statement from Adrian Vido, Ford of Canada's Windsor, ON, site manager, when that operation was closed in June: "The company's decision to move away from in-house casting operations is based on a thorough analysis of our business and a need to focus on our core operations (italics mine.) While difficult, these are the right actions for Ford's future."  

I understand corporate-speak well enough to know what message he was delivering at that time. But, shouldn't a metalcasting site manager have a little more awareness than to use a word like "core" in that specific context?

Which, of course, only brings me back to wondering what Ford's core operations are, or will be — especially when its rivals have made very nearly the opposite decision. 

Published Friday, June 22, 2007 7:04 AM by REB

Comments

 

whuskonen said:

The "core" operations at Ford are probably defined as design and assembly of automobiles and related vehicles. Apparently, management has made an analysis that shows that the company can acquire a percentage of the castings it needs from Tier One and even Tier Two suppliers.

This is good news for the rest of the foundry industry, because it translates into more opportunity.

Wally Huskonen

June 22, 2007 2:27 PM
Anonymous comments are disabled